Honoring LGBTQI Rights -- And Everyone Else's: A Libertarian Tradition

by Michael Acree

"Pro-choice on everything"--everything peaceful. The Libertarian philosophy, nicely captured in that slogan, embodies a profound respect for individual differences. Accordingly the Libertarian Party has supported the rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, and inscrutable individuals since its founding in 1971.

The Party platform specifically calls for "the repeal of all laws regarding consensual sexual relations, including prostitution and solicitation, and the cessation of state oppression and harassment of homosexual men and women, that they, at last, be accorded their full rights as individuals." Pretty impressive, considering that in 1971 the American Psychiatric Association still classified homosexuality as a disease.

In supporting the rights of LGBTQI people, however, we are not recognizing any special "group rights." Ironically, those who oppose concepts like "gay rights" often implicitly claim special rights for other groups, such as heterosexuals or adults. Libertarians believe that human rights are not specific to age, sex, race, or sexual orientation, and that LGBTQI people have in particular the same rights as anyone else to marry whom they please, to adopt and have custody of children, and to serve openly in the military.

Our strong stand on civil liberties also does not mean that the Libertarian Party specifically approves of homosexuality, or prostitution, or drug use. Some Libertarians actually disapprove of all of these things. But they don't believe they have the right to impose their beliefs on others. Their inspiring example shows the way for all of us to get along with our differences.

Conservatives and liberals may disagree on whether the basic evil is sex or greed, but both tend to believe that everything they disapprove of, like pornography or high rents, should be illegal, and that everything they think is good, like education or giving to the poor, should be made compulsory. The logic of their common approach, if fully implemented, would leave us all ideally with no choice in any aspect of our lives--and no responsibility.

In truth, very few people see the need for more government control of their own lives, but liberals and conservatives agree on the need for more control over other people's lives. Respect for individual differences--the Libertarian approach--means allowing other people to live their lives peacefully as they see fit, even if we're sure their choices are misguided.

Our commitment to freedom across the board means that we also support, in Robert Nozick's phrase, the repeal of all prohibitions on "capitalist acts between consenting adults." Just as the State has no business coming between you and your partner(s), it has no business coming between you and your tenant or landlord, between you and your customers, or between you and your employer. It is no more appropriate for the government to force you to rent an apartment to me or to hire me than to force you to have sex with me. Libertarians believe these relationships, like all others, should be voluntary. Bigots have rights, too. Not only that: Sometimes we ourselves want to discriminate. If we have a store in a gay neighborhood, we may prefer to hire gay employees, both for business reasons and for support of the community.

If we simply get government out of the picture, queer folk and homophobes will have nothing to fear from each other, since neither can then use the coercive power of the state to impose its values on the other.

The impulse to control others has had particularly tragic consequences for gay people, as is widely recognized, in the age of AIDS. Having medical decisions made by bureaucrats rather than by patients and doctors imposes an oppressive uniformity on treatment regimens and makes criminals of those seeking alternatives.

The Libertarian Party has called from the beginning for the abolition of the DEA and the FDA, and the decriminalization of all drugs. It also calls for strict separation of state and science: Research by bureaucracy is as conservative and monolithic as bureaucratic medicine; the very heavy dominance of the field by the federal government greatly restricts the diversity of approaches that are pursued, in research on AIDS or anything else.

Historically, governments have been far more zealous in oppressing than in protecting LGBTQI people. In the 21st century, they still deny us basic rights like marriage and adoption. For those who may consider it foolhardy, or even demeaning, to rely on our oppressors to protect us, it is important that we retain the right to defend ourselves, as guaranteed by the Second Amendment. Don't you wish Matthew Shepard had been armed so that he could have defended himself and were with us today?

The Tao Te Ching observed 2500 years ago that "governing a big country is like cooking a small fish": Too much handling will destroy it. We are just beginning to appreciate the wisdom of the great Lao Tzu in recent years, as scientific developments like complexity theory are pointing to spontaneous order as a more viable basis for a peaceful and prosperous society than the imposition of top-down control (so 20th century!). Libertarians believe, in short, that freedom is not only humane, but practical. The War on Drugs, like alcohol prohibition before it, surely demonstrates clearly enough the futility and the destructiveness of trying to control people by force.

Can you relate to the idea of not imposing your values on others by force, even if you have "the good of society" at heart? Can you match the generosity of spirit of those odd libertarians who believe homosexuality is wrong, but who also believe LGBTQI people have the right to live their lives as they see fit? If our vision of peace and respect appeals to you, please join us in helping to make it a reality!

 

Check out the Libertarian Party

To Join Outright Libertarians, Click Here.