We've taken some criticism from people who take the Indiana RFRA at face value, assuming that because it claims to stand for religious freedom, anybody who opposes it is in favor of the enslavement of bakers and florists. This could not be farther from the truth - it is possible to oppose both bigotry, and bad law, and still be libertarian. In fact, we feel it is a moral imperative to do so!!
Bigotry is not "speech". Its source is the heart and mind, not the voice. If we feel that liberty is worth our efforts to persuade and enlighten, why not issues of social stigma as well? It's irrational to leap from freedom of association to a pro-bigotry stance. They represent two very different organizing principles.
The market is proving its power to solve a problem the state created in Indiana. We should be pointing to that and saying "We told you so", not taking the wrong side and shilling for bigots. Unfortunately, many of our allies in the libertarian movement bring with them a vulnerability to deceptive right-wing rhetoric. This attempt to cloak an establishment of religion in "freedom" is one of those times.
There seems to be a lot of confusion among libertarians on how to handle the issue of marriage equality from a uniquely libertarian standpoint. Some suggest that the struggle to remove government from our personal lives requires more than equal marriage rights for same sex couples – I agree with them. Others adopt the all-or-nothing approach of opposing marriage equality now in favor of abolishing state marriage altogether – I disagree with these people.
I want to point out the historical point addressed by this meme: an ideological critique to the notion of inherited power in what is supposed to be a merit-based individualist society. Having power pass from father to son was the legacy of aristocracy and monarchy … It’s impossible to be a Constitutional conservative and want to be ruled by an aristocracy.
The error in reasoning which leads people to believe that Rand must surely be like his father, is the same one which led humans to submit to hereditary transfers of power for thousands of years, and which leads people to believe that entire families of evil human beings named “Clinton” or “Bush” must be great ideas for President!! Confronting that core idea is totally fair game for libertarian activism within the context of a constitutional republic which our founders absolutely never meant to become anything like what they fought to overcome.
The fact that this escaped nearly everybody who saw the meme is just proof of how far we’ve strayed from one of the most important concepts that fueled the revolution that led to our founding. Go read the Federalist/Anti-Federalist documents if you aren’t aware of what a huge thing that was to both sides of the question – all were agreed that aristocracies were to be avoided no matter what; that power should no longer be passed as inheritance, but that it must be earned by merit.
I believe it is very clear, Rand has not earned by merit the loyalty he claims through his father, and a dialogue about that is useful not only against Rand, but against the Clintons and Bushes as well. The thing they have in common was really important to our founders … It should be important to us, too.